Click for the latest Flagstaff weather forecast.

the truth is even more inconvenient

The other day, I read a bumper sticker that said, “question their answers.” Frankly, I can’t think of a better slogan to accompany a good honest interrogation of the green “revolution” we’re apparently having. While this post is not one on how the media has cheapened and co-opted the meaning behind the word, “revolution,” it is, similarly, one about deception and the reinforcement of dominant power structures.

A friend of mine was appalled by recent claims by the global warming skeptics that this green frenzy was simply cooked up by politicians and CEO’s to make money while at the same time, fear mongering. It is a disgusting thought, but I can’t blame the skeptics for thinking this. Not one bit.

It’s everywhere—completely unchecked and out of control.

Last month provided many “green” gift ideas for xmas. Apparently Pittsburgh rang in the new year with an eco friendly dropping ball. The Daily Green: “The Consumer’s Guide to the Green Revolution”, however, provides information on everything from green cuizines to tips on taking “green vacations” to information on how to win a $250,000 “eco-makeover”—where you can “green your car, green your home, green your life.”

The New Air Jordan basketball shoes are made from recycled “sustainable” material. The first “Green” sports shoe. Nevermind the fact that the shoes still come from exploited countries thousands of miles away and require the design and construction of new machines in order to be constructed. Sustainable indeed.

The “Green” revolution is bullshit. For anyone paying attention, it quickly became a marketing strategy, used by politicians to claim moral superiority and used by corporations to reinforce false virtues of capitalism by promoting consumption to save the planet. Yoink! It’s a classic bate and switch, the ol’ buff and bluff, the ol’…well, you get the point.

I recently read Derrick Jensen’s new graphic novel that pokes fun at Al Gore and An Inconvenient Truth. The truth of course is even more inconvenient. Remember all those tips provided at the end of the film—such as replacing lightbulbs, installing low-flow shower heads, recycling, and keeping your tires inflated—that were touted as individual things everyone can do to save the planet? Lets go through them…

1. Replacing one regular light bulb with a compact fluorescent saves 150 pounds of carbon dioxide per year. If everyone in the U.S. does this, 400 million tons of carbon dioxide would be saved.

2. You’ll save one pound of carbon dioxide for every mile you don’t drive
(Which of course means you put out one pound for every mile you do). Considering that motorists in the U.S. drive about 2.3 trillion miles, if we cut that in half we save about 575 million tons of CO2

3. Recycle: you can save 2,400 pounds of carbon dioxide per year by recycling just half of your household waste
(Which means, of course, that you still dump 2,400 pounds for the other half). If every American household did this, 125 million tons of CO2 would be saved.

4. Keeping your tires inflated properly can improve gas mileage by more than 3%. Every gallon of gasoline saved keeps 20 pounds of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.
(Which means that every gallon burned… )

5. You can install a low flow showerhead to save 350 pounds of CO2 per year and wash your clothes in cold or warm water to save 500 pounds per year. If both of these are implemented, 105 million tons will be saved.

6. Roughly another 105 million tons of CO2 would be saved if people adjusted their thermostat an average of 2 degrees down in the winter and up and in the summer.

7. Plant a tree: one will absorb one ton of CO2 during its lifetime
(Or we could just stop cutting them down). Again, if everybody in the U.S. did this, roughly seven million tons of CO2 will be saved.

Go ahead and add up the numbers; the math is pretty easy (and I was an English major!). If all these individual cut-backs were implemented, about 1.5 billion tons of CO2 would be saved! Relish in this utopia—this land of make believe. Thanks Al!

There is just one problem. Total carbon emissions for the U.S. are 7.1 billion tons per year. All these hokey individual contributions, which appeared in Al Gore’s list at the end of An Inconvienent Truth, would decrease emissions by a little over 20 percent—and lets be real with this culture, it won’t happen.

But for the sake of argument, lets pretend every American does implement these strategies and emissions are cut by 21%. There are still two major kickers:
A) the general scientific consensus holds that at least half (that would be 50%…) of our emissions need to be cut before any meaningful transformation may occur.
B) Considering, of course, that the total carbon emissions for the U.S. increase roughly two percent every year, the fact that we’ve all been swindled by corporate sponsored “green” propaganda” should be horribly clear.

It is the job of marketers to get you to associate products and brand names with the kind of positive emotions and feelings we’re all seeking. We all want to help the environment, but we won’t buy our way out of this one.

Sure, ride your bike, recycle, use energy efficient light bulbs, install low-flow shower-heads, be slightly hotter in the summer and slightly colder in the winter, and keep those tires properly inflated. But do it because you want to live a good moral life, not because you think you’re saving the planet. Because you’re not.

Explore posts in the same categories: "green", books

3 Comments on “the truth is even more inconvenient”

  1. Michael Shaw Says:

    Don’t get me wrong, I am in favour of reducing pollution, conserving resources et cetera, but keep in mind that humanity is only responsible for a small fraction of CO2 production. Termites, as a species, produce more CO2 than humans. CO2 comprises less than one half of one tenth of one percent of the atmosphere. The most abundant and the most potent greenhouse gas is water vapour - H2O mole per mole has a higher enthalpy than CO2 - yet hydrogen fueled automobiles are touted as a solution for global warming.
    Just look up at the sun to see the real cause of global warming. Envirnmental alarmists who think that humanity causes climate change and humanity can change the same are an example of pure hubris. Besides I am rather enjoying the milder winters here in Canada.

  2. kyle Says:

    Well, I’m not going to waste my time trying to convince you otherwise, but I don’t want to write you off either.

    Many people and corporations are making a lot of money on keeping this a debatable issue and, according to your comment, it sounds like they’re doing a damn good job. So we obviously disagree with each other there.

    But the recent and overwhelming focus on climate change, as real and as scary as it is, has detracted from the other environmental problems that continue to exist.

    You mentioned pollution and resource depletion. Those are two problems that have turned hundreds of miles of sea into dead zones. If you see fish as resources, note that 90 percent of the large fish in the sea are gone. Consider mineral depletion, soil erosion, the fact that every single stream in the US contains carcinogens (and cancer is now the leading cause of death), or that dioxin and other deadly chemicals are commonly found in women’s breast milk….

    There have been 5 major world-wide periods of mass-extinction of species during the earth’s recorded existence. We are in the middle of the sixth one. 150 species are lost every day. The primary reason is simply loss of habitat.

    Nobody can argue that we’re not behind much of, if not all of these things.

    I’m not an alarmist, I’m a realist, one of many who would rather not live under the threat of apocalypse than maintain an abusive, exploitive lifestyle that is not only killing us but isn’t even making us any happier.

    Instead of visiting blog sites and trying to cut me down on things we obviously don’t agree on, why don’t you consider the things we DO agree on. I’m tired of simply “respectfully disagreeing” with people and then never talking to them again. My point is, we don’t have to agree on global warming, but align yourself somewhere. We can build from there.

  3. » Blog Archive » Getting closer: “Gore says ‘changing light bulbs’ not enough” Says:

    […] I’m glad Al is realizing how useless these individual changes are and looking at the bigger picture. I would encourage him to think bigger though. Sure changing light bulbs is not enough, but neither is changing laws. Unless, I guess, they are BIG changes. BIG. […]

Comment:

The Author

You’ve stumbled upon the adventures of an English teacher and writer, peddling deeper connections to a physical and emotional reality in Northern Arizona.

kyle[at]undertheconcrete[dot]org