Cookoo crazy pants and the myth of the liberal media
Thursday, February 10th, 2011I’m in the middle of an overnight shift at the woman’s and children’s shelter and I’m really wired on some hippie energy drink I bought at Newfronz. And I’m catching up on the news. Normally I leave much of the mainstream media, let alone Glenn Beck, out of any critical discussion of the media. But seriously. Glenn Beck. I can’t F’ing stand him. He’s a fear monger. He prays on insecurities. He has an answer and works backwards, which is the opposite of what journalists do. His analysis is propaganda. His logic is loony tunes.
I just watched this:
So he took every protest that occurred throughout the world from the last two years and put together this cookoo crazy pants story about how there is a coordinated conspiracy. Anyone paying attention to international news during the last two years knows that each of these instances throughout the world has little if anything to do with one another. France protested because of labor issues, others because of student tuition increases, inadequate wages…Irish citizens demonstrated in reaction to a massive bailout. Yet according to Beck it’s all a coordinated Islamo-fascist take over. He gives his audience no credit. Maybe they don’t deserve it. I’m so sick of this shit.
This guy is on television with his own show! There is zero accountability for his lies, accusations, and conspiracies.
And they’ll tell you the media is liberal. That tea-party favorite, Christine O’Donnell from Delaware, just launched a political action group aimed at fighting back against the liberal media. We hear it all the time.
Lets be honest. Today the Democrats in our country sound more and more like republicans and republicans sound more and more like crazy over-medicated, insecure creepy weirdo racists that are increasingly out of touch with physical reality.
Back to the media. First of all, we live in society with an election process that is for sale. As long as any corporation, even international and multi-national corporations, are free to contribute as much money to elections as they want, the integrity of the whole voting process is shot. Same thing with the media. We can’t expect any media to be objective if they have to answer to sponsors. How are we to react when we see an “investigative story” into big oil, then see an ad for Shell or BP? How are we supposed to react to news pieces about government bailouts just after an advertisement for Fannie Mae? It’s a joke. It’s news and information that is displayed through a particular lens – one that is sure not to be too critical of the many hands that feed it. Journalism needs to be above these interests.
Second of all, lets look at the major figures in popular media. Think of the most far-right conservative talking heads in media today. Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, Pat Robertson… If these folks don’t have their own show, they have their own friggin’ network. These folks can often spout the most racist, sexist, close-minded conservatism our country can muster. For the most part, all this goes unchecked.
Now, think of their counterparts in the media. If these folks represent the far right, who in the media represents the far left?
Yeah, I can’t think of any either. Gross, Olbermann, Maddow? Give me a break! The far left is not represented in the media at all. Where are the critical and meaningful debates on environmental racism? The anti-war movement (I know, what anti-war movement)? Critical discussions on loss of species, peak oil, forced sterilization, preventable diseases, or acquaintance rape? When have you seen any critical discussions on the cultural and physical health of emerging technologies, biotechnologies, or pharmaceuticals? Of course there are not these discussions when the next commercial is from Monsanto or Dow Chemical. When have you ever seen the media speak with an indigenous person? When was the last time you’ve ever heard a critique of consumerism in the media? That’s right, there can’t be a critique of consumerism if the media is predicated on industrial capitalism. Again, journalism needs to be above all these interests.
Folks often point to the fact that most journalists happen to vote democratically, therefore the media is liberal. This predication assumes that individual journalists have any say or power in deciding exactly what will be reported, and perhaps more importantly, how it will be reported – how the news agency, loyal to it’s advertisers, will frame the issue.
There is an old propaganda tool at work here too. “Tell it like it ain’t.” The more folks say the media is liberal, the less we really know what liberal means and the more far-left views are marginalized. This works to the advantage of the far-right media in legitimizing their crazy cookoo pants ideologies.
It is no great secret that I am in love with Democracy Now!. Their recent coverage of the on-going protests in Egypt have been unparalleled. It has been the most honest, personal, and professional display of journalism I think I’ve ever seen. And of course, they have no advertisers. While the mainstream media often argues back and forth between two view points, DN!’s coverage reveals multiple perspectives that is completely beyond anything the mainstream media is even structurally capable of.