The Elves strike again
Monday, March 3rd, 2008WOODINVILLE, Wash. (AP) — Fires gutted four multimillion-dollar model homes in a Seattle suburb on Monday, and authorities found a sign purportedly left by eco-terrorists that mocks claims that the homes were environmentally friendly.
“Built Green? Nope black!” said the spray-painted sign that bore the initials of the radical environmental group Earth Liberation Front.
Explosive devices were found in the homes, and crews were able to remove them, said Fire Chief Rick Eastman of Snohomish County District 7. The FBI was investigating the fires as a potential domestic terrorism act, said FBI spokesman Rich Kolko in Washington, D.C.
The fires started at the “Street of Dreams,” a strip of unoccupied, furnished luxury model homes where developers show off the latest in high-end housing, interior design and landscaping. The homes are later sold.
No injuries were reported in the fires, which began before dawn in the wooded subdivision and were still smoldering by midmorning.
The homes are in a development near the headwaters of Bear Creek, which is home to endangered chinook salmon. Opponents of the development had questioned whether the luxury homes could pollute the creek and an aquifer that is a drinking water source, and whether enough was done to protect nearby wetlands.
The sign, a sheet with red scraggly letters, said “McMansions in RCDs r not green,” a reference to rural cluster developments.
One of the people involved in the project said the homes used “green” techniques such as water-pervious sidewalks, super-insulated walls and windows and products made with recycled materials, such carpet pads. Advertising for last summer’s Street of Dreams show focused on the environmentally friendly aspects of the homes, which were smaller than some of the huge houses featured in years past.
Say what you want about the tactics, but I agree with the message. As long as we are made to believe houses like this are “good” for the environment, the millionaires who buy them can continue to justify their irresponsible lifestyle. Why is there not a bigger movement to retro-fit old houses or older cars with more efficient amenities. Why does it seem that “buying green” automatically means buying new? This all stinks of environmental inequality. The tiny fraction of people in this country who can afford mansions like this can now also claim moral superiority because their houses are “Green.”