Archive for the 'take action' Category

150 Rally & March for Protection of Holy San Francisco Peaks

Saturday, April 23rd, 2011

*PRESS RELEASE*
On Saturday April 16th, more than 150 people rallied outside of Flagstaff City Hall and held a march for protection of the holy San Francisco Peaks.

The protest was called to address the imminent threat of environmental and cultural destruction by owners of the Arizona Snowbowl Ski resort.

On April 1st the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an emergency motion by the Save the Peaks Coalition to stop Snowbowl ski area and the U.S. Department of Agriculture from cutting down thousands of trees on the San Francisco Peaks, outside of Flagstaff, Arizona.

With no injunction in place bulldozers could be moving any day. The Save the Peaks Coalition estimates approximately 30,000 trees, including old growth, are threatened to be clear-cut.

At Saturday’s protest a cardboard bulldozer with a toilet bowl on top, Forest Service and City of Flagstaff logos, attempted to run down young people holding signs painted like trees. The theatrical bulldozer was stopped by a group in bio-hazard suits who linked arms and chanted, “Protect the Peaks!”

At about 4:00 p.m. the protest shifted to a march and headed into downtown Flagstaff. When the march reached San Francisco street, someone yelled, “Save the San Francisco Peaks, Take the Streets!” and the crowd flooded the road. The crowd later returned to City Hall and rallied with speakers calling for further action to protect the Peaks.

At the end of the rally the American Indian Movement song was sung in support of a direct action occupation currently stopping desecration of a sacred burial site in Glen Cove, California near the Bay Area.

The demonstration was held during the City of Flagstaff’s Earth Day event to draw attention to their role in the development.

Since 1997 Arizona Snowbowl has been attempting to expand current
development on the San Francisco Peaks by clearcutting 74 acres of rare alpine habitat that is home to threatened species, making new runs and lifts, adding more parking lots and building a 14.8 mile buried pipeline to transport up to 180 million gallons (per season) of wastewater to make artificial snow on 205 acres. And since 1997 there has been such fierce community resistance to expansion plans that Snowbowl has been held off until now.

The slopes of the Peaks are central to the ways of life of more than 13
Indigenous Nations. For 5 decades development on the Holy Mountain has been consistently resisted through litigation, direct action and prayer.

In 2002, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, with no real
public process, quietly decided to allow wastewater to be used for
snowmaking purposes. Later that year the Flagstaff Mayor and City Council signed a contract to allow the sale of sewage effluent for snowmaking on the holy mountain. The contract has since been renewed administratively, behind closed doors without any public input.

The sewage effluent has been proven by biologists to contain harmful contaminants such as pharmaceuticals and hormones, yet the Forest Service didn’t consider what the impacts would be if anyone were to consume the fake snow. This point is the basis of the Save the Peaks Coalition’s current lawsuit which is currently appealing a negative District Court decision.

Snowbowl would be the only ski area in the world that would be using 100% wastewater for snowmaking purposes.

In 2010 Flagstaff City Manager Kevin Burke revealed a plan, secretly
negotiated with the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), for use of
Flagstaff’s drinking water instead of the sewage effluent. Snowbowl was offered 11 million tax payer’s dollars to subsidize the increased costs of using potable water. Stating that the US government believed drinking water snowmaking to be “less offensive” to Indigenous Nations the plan was pushed, although no consultation with Indigenous Nations had previously occurred.

Needless to say, the Tribes were in consensus in opposing the proposal. More than 700 people, including official Indigenous representatives, showed up to a City Council meeting for consideration of the sale. The majority stated opposition to the plan.

Although the decision by the USDA to subsidize drinking water as a “less offensive” option for snowmaking appeared to be an admission that the wastewater plan was a bad idea, the USDA continues to aggressively battle the Save the Peaks Coalition in court.

Early this year the USDA began listening sessions to hear Indigenous Peoples concerns on the of sacred places. The sessions were initiated, in part, due to the Peaks controversy.

The USDA currently has the power to revoke the Special Use Permit for Arizona Snowbowl for greater public interest.

TAKE ACTION NOW!

Contact Flagstaff City Officials and urge them to RESPECT the environment, Indigenous culture, and protect public health by finding a way out of their contract to sell Snowbowl wastewater!
PHONE: (928) 779-7600
EMAIL: council@flagstaffaz.gov

Contact Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and express concern that there was no meaningful public process when the agency approved wastewater for snowmaking. File a complaint and demand full public review!

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
1110 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
(800) 234-5677 – Toll Free

Northern Regional Office
1801 West Route 66, Suite 117
Flagstaff, Arizona 86001
(877) 602-3675 – Toll Free

www.azdeq.gov/function/compliance/complaint.html

Contact the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), which heads the Forest Service, and urge them to revoke the Special Use Permit for Arizona Snowbowl for greater public interest.
The USDA has been holding hearings on protection of sacred places due to the Peaks controversy. Urge the USDA to immediately place an administrative hold on all development on the San Francisco Peaks!

Tom Vilsack
U.S. Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Ave., S.W.
Washington, DC 20250

Phone: 202-720-3631

Email: TribalSacredSites@fs.fed.us

For Additional Information:
www.fs.fed.us/spf/tribalrelations/sacredsites.shtml

Send Letters to the Editor of your local papers.
Arizona Daily Sun: rwilson@azdailysun.com

animal rights demo Fri.: World Week for Animals in Laboratories

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

Boicot a la presencia de Guillermo Habacuc Vargas en la Bienal de Artes Visuales de Honduras 2008

Sunday, April 13th, 2008

Costa Rica’s Visual Arts Biennial (Bienarte) 2007 showcased a select group of artists. One of these artists, Guillermo Vargas Habakkuk, chained a lost dog to the wall of the exhibition and let it starve to death. That was his artistic contribution, which was appreciated so much that he has been invited to the Bienal de Artes Visuales de Honduras 2008 (The Biennial of Visual Arts of Honduras 2008), which is scheduled to take place in November in the country’s capital.

Half a million people have already signed the petition to drop this asshole from the art show and shame those that think there is artistic merit to animal abuse and murder.

This guy has a decent breakdown of the artist’s motivation. I see his point, I think, but it’s still abuse and murder.

There doesn’t seem to be a lot out there on this, at least in English. You can go to the artist’s website, but I don’t want to advertise for him. So if you really want to see messed up pictures of a dog starving to death in an art gallery as people stand by and do NOTHING, you can find them pretty easily.

Arizona: Speak Out Against Harmful Pro-Factory Farming Bill

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

This is about stopping cruelty and abuse. Please read and act.

The factory farming lobby is once again trying to stop animal advocates, concerned citizens and even local governments from having a say when it comes to the treatment of farm animals. S.B. 1373, introduced by Sens. Burns, Aguirre, Arzberger, and Flake, will prohibit city, state and county governments, as well as Arizona citizens from using the initiative process to advance any policy regarding how egg-laying hens are confined on factory farms. Only the Arizona Department of Agriculture will have authority over standards set for millions of animals in the state, preventing any improvements to farm animal protection policy.

If enacted, S.B. 1373 would uphold the factory farming industry’s cruel status quo, ensuring that laying hens continue to be crammed into battery cages inside windowless, ammonia-filled warehouses, where they never see the light of day. In addition to allowing for the continued cruel treatment of hens, S.B. 1373 would prevent any regulation of the egg industry by a county, city, town, or other political subdivision of the state. It would also set a dangerous precedent that, if successful for Arizona’s factory farming industry, is likely to be copied across the nation.

S.B. 1373 is yet another backlash against our recent success in Arizona, where the cruel factory farming practice of confining pigs in gestation crates has been banned. This legislation is a follow up to last year’s SCR 1035, also pushed by Sen. Flake, which sought to nullify the 2005 citizen passed ballot initiative that reformed the factory hog farming industry by banning gestation crates in Arizona. S.B. 1373 seems to be crafted as a preemptive measure to stop the passage of a similar ban on battery cages in the state.

More information and action info here

animal rights demo, monday morning.

Sunday, November 4th, 2007

Who: ARN! (animal rights now! of NAU/flagstaff)
What: Demonstration.
When: 10:30 – 12:00.
Where: We are meeting on the east side of Wall Aquatic and in front of the Wettaw building- from there, we will march to the Biology Annex (21B)

http://home.nau.edu/maps.asp

Why: Animal Rights NOW! is holding a demonstration to protest the animal testing facility on campus. Members of ARN! have tried to contact employees of the facility, but they have ignored our requests for information and refuse to meet with us. Though NAU has said that students’ tuition does not go directly to animal testing (they like to call it “using animals for research”), our dollars DO go to pay for equipment, chemicals, and the salaries of these “scientists.”

To throw a little fuel on the fire, I suppose, a faculty member of NAU contacted the boss of one of the ARN! members (the same one I’ve been talking to recently about an article for December) and said this person is a threat to the university and should be fired (and that these views were shared with Pres. Haeger). So there will be increased security, including police. All this for an animal rights protest on campus? What are they hiding?

Come support ARN! and show NAU that we DEMAND answers.